THE PAINFUL TRUTH FOR AD AGENCIES

Ham on 07 26, 2008

As competition builds up in a tough economy, agencies find themselves becoming increasingly irrelevant!

When I returned to writing my regular column in this paper two weeks ago, the piece was too painful for some to bear.

The truth hurts when I write about how we have painted ourselves into a corner and shortchanged the industry by undervaluing our expertise and contributions to the advertising process. In fact, a close friend even phoned me to ask why I’m ruffling feathers and to leave well enough alone. And why must I write stuff that everybody already knows is the hidden truth. Fortunately,

I also received nine letters expressing their support to my argument and I thank them for it. So this week, I’ll talk about the other side of the coin: about ad agencies who are now better known as brand or creative agencies.

How brand agencies make money has also evolved into a science.

If in the early days it was based on commission, now the system is about fees, time costs, supervision fees and profit-sharing, based on results. But their problems are more than how to make money; it’s about how they can remain relevant.

In a recent report called The Connected Agency by Mary Beth Kemp and Peter Kim for Forrester Research, Inc, they summed it up most eloquently ?

Today’s agencies fail to help marketers engage with consumers, who, as a result, are becoming less brand-loyal and more trusting of each other. To turn the tide, marketers will move to the Connected Agency — one that shifts: from making messages to nurturing consumer connections; from delivering push to creating pull interactions; and from orchestrating campaigns to facilitating conversations.

Over the next five years, traditional agencies will make this shift; they will start by connecting with consumer communities and will eventually become an integral part of them.

There are many reasons why this argument holds true.

Consumers dislike advertising because of its irrelevance, interruption, and clutter. And still, marketers are deploying the same formula they’ve been using for years: Buy exposure to reach as many eyeballs as possible; place the message in a spot where it can’t be missed; and repeat the same message as often as possible. Citing four highlights from the report, here are some holes in this age-old approach:

1. Consumers prefer pull to push. Almost all consumers own a PC and mobile phone, and they spend almost half of their media time with interactive channels.

In Malaysia

alone, more than half the population spends a few hours a day online.

2. Fragmentation drives complexity. The number of media channels available to marketers, agencies and consumers has exploded. Proliferation of choice offers marketers new opportunities, such as social networks, mobile, and branded entertainment.

Each of these has its own success metrics and dynamics, making comparison and the calculation of ROI impossible.

3. Engagement remains theoretical, while reach and frequency reign. The marketing funnel is an outdated metaphor that helps preserve a siloed approach to media planning. Media firms try to combat the issue by recommending integrated marketing strategies, which rarely go beyond creative repurposed for multiple channels.

4. A new definition of “mass media” is emerging. The new mass media is made up of a collection of communities. While many consumers are involved, each individual community is small, fragmenting the market further. As more consumers become involved in Social Computing, these platforms will grow and eclipse today’s mainstream media.

In a Q4 2006 Forrester survey in the US, marketers said agencies are currently creating many more detractors than promoters. Senior marketers turning to agencies for help

have found that most of them don’t have the proper skills or structures to assist. One advertising director at a high-tech firm even said, “They’re a necessary evil.” The problem? Agencies are organised around skills.

The problems do not end there. Creative and media agencies are stuck in the mass media world. Digital agencies understand interaction but know too little about branding. And brand consultancies give a false sense of assurance to confused marketers because they cannot deliver that extra “oomph” which is still the domain of creative agencies.

How Malaysian creative agencies are going to grapple with this truth about the future of advertising is where the challenge lies. And if they “get it” before the so-called impending recession, then they should weather all storms. Come rain or shine.

Send article as PDF to PDF
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Comments (8)

 

  1. Jeff Zweig says:

    in my view, here’s the easy answer if you believe that interactive agencies “know too little about branding” :

    reserve an equal seat at the strategic development table for interactive agencies and/or interactive experts so that the resultant marketing approach leverages all sets of skills in an integrated fashion: branding from the traditional agency perspective and interaction from the digital marketing side.

    i know that there are a number of interactive agencies in malaysia (mine included) that have many examples of successful case studies where media planning skills, traditional ad agency skills and digital marketing skills all came together to deliver excellent results.

    how did we do it? simple.

    everyone made sure that the right integrated, cross-disciplinary team was involved from start to finish, thereby leveraging everyone’s expertise.

    this type of approach has been working successfully for years in the US and Europe. I see no reason why it can’t work here in malaysia—we certainly have the talent in all the different required areas of expertise!

    jeff zweig
    chief guru, web guru asia
    http://www.webguruasia.com

  2. Boon says:

    Hi Sledgehammer,

    How you think the future of mobile advertising in Malaysia? How should we positioned ourselves?

  3. Ham,
    This note comes to you from Kepala Raja (King’s Head). Very interesting stuff, but has anyone got statistics as to PC ownership? It may be misleading to say “Almost all consumers own a PC” but you may be spot on with the figures on mobile phones.In the absence of authentic figures and with Streamyx acting up every now and then, where would advertisers be putting their money?

    cheers

  4. Suffian says:

    I disagree that engagement is theoretical. It can be measured. Especially with online engagement. You’ve got comments, links, link-backs, track-backs, ping-backs, time-spent, bounce rates, Diggs, social bookmarking, IM, blog posts, unique visitors etc. Reach and frequency is old school and it doesn’t apply to the Internet. zomg!

  5. ad-critic says:

    Fact is that many digital agencies are brought in too late to contribute to the creative process. If not, they are given a place on the table but are not regarded as full creative partners with the same authority as mainstream creatives who lump interactive and BTL creatives as their poorer cousins. Or at best, their proven “suppliers” in interactive creative services.

    Recently, there was a backlash against BBDO’s hogging of all the credit for its wildly successful HBO “Voyeur” website in Adage.

    Read what the Spaceship CEO has to say about his agency’s role in giving BBDO the creative edge.

    http://creativity-online.com/?action=news:article&newsId=130090

  6. Peter Kim says:

    Hi – let me tell you that my experience since the publication of that report has been very similar. Agencies keep insisting that they know all of this already, yet refuse to change. Others are simply numb to the message and waiting for retirement. Typically, smaller agencies correlate with agility and ability to adapt to emerging trends, making them more suitable for helping brands connect to today’s consumers.

  7. Brian Owens says:

    Interesting point of view. I’ll consider changing my mind about this but for now I still don’t see things the same way you do.

  8. Sheena Gurbakhash says:

    Did someone ask for stats?
    Here are some stats:
    http://www.skmm.gov.my/facts_figures/stats/index.asp

    No PC figures though but better than nothing

Leave a Reply

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

ADOI TWIT TRACKER